• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Patella Tilt

Blackhorse

Guru
Messages
230
Location
Irvine, CA
Best answers
0
What do you use for ICD-10 code? M22.2X1? Just want to make sure.


Thank you.

Blackhorse, CPC-A
 
Last edited:
Code looks good to me

ICD.10 was supposed to be a lot more specific than ICD.9, but this just shows all we got were a lot more codes with no real increase in specificity.

My two cents.
 
"Patellar Tilt" is essentially a finding/abnormality based on the X-ray study, not on the physical examination. It is seen on the Tangential or Sunrise view of the Patella. As such, for ICD-10, the M22 Code Set for Disorder of the Patella is totally lacking of the "specificity" needed for this diagnosis. There are several possibilities: M22.2X _: Patellofemoral disorders; M22.3X _: Other derangements of the patella; and M22.8X _: Other disorders of the patella. As usual, "Other" applies to "none of the above." M22.2X _ is for Patellofemoral disorders, which implies that the problem involves both the Patella and Femur, which "Patellar Tilt" does not. I frankly don't know the difference between "disorder" and "derangement" as it applies to the Patella. From my perspective, they are the essentially the same. I even looked them up in the dictionary and couldn't find any significant difference in their definitions. Based on that, I would say that both M22.3X _ or M22.8X _ would be correct, with M22.3X _ being slightly more specific.
Furthermore, I can not figure out why there is a 5th Character X in M22.2X, M22.3X, or M22.8X. The 5th Character could have simply been for laterality. If someone can explain/justify that for me, I would appreciate it.
Hopefully this will help (some).

Respectfully submitted, Alan Pechacek, M.D.
icd10orthocoder.com
 
Top