• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Fell, needs work excuse, no injuries

tag60

Guest
Messages
150
Location
Santee, CA
Best answers
0
Provider gives "contusion" as final diagnosis, but nothing in the record supports this. Do I use it anyway? I guess he was as much at a loss what to choose as I am! Here's the note:

S: Pt fell getting out of bathtub, fell onto arms. Didn't hit or bang her head. No LOC, no headache, no nausea/vomiting, no pain anywhere. Needs a work excuse.
O: (Goes over main systems, all WNL.) Also states: "No abrasions, no bruises, no edema."
A/P: Contusion, 924.9. Note for work given. Recommend OTC Tylenol for pain.

I wondered if V65.2, person feigning illness, would be appropriate for me to code without the provider stating that himself? I have also considered V65.8, other reasons for seeking consultation. This is the entire note; I can't find even one symptom to pick up. Or do I just give the provider what he states, despite his documentation to the contrary?

Thanks so much for any input!
 
Top