• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki DM with comorbidities

cwmiusa

New
Messages
9
Best answers
0
I have physicians asking how to document all the DM with comorbidities diagnoses. If a patient has DM with hyperglycemia, DM with neuropathy and DM with retinopathy, should they list all; E11.65, E11.40 and 11.319 or just pick one. They complain that listing them all is cumbersome and clutters their problem list. They all map to the same HCC so is it important to list all or is only one counted? Thank you for assisting with clarification.
 
I have physicians asking how to document all the DM with comorbidities diagnoses. If a patient has DM with hyperglycemia, DM with neuropathy and DM with retinopathy, should they list all; E11.65, E11.40 and 11.319 or just pick one. They complain that listing them all is cumbersome and clutters their problem list. They all map to the same HCC so is it important to list all or is only one counted? Thank you for assisting with clarification.


It's proper coding to code for all the DM manifestations. (Whether or not you can get that across to your physicians is another story.)

Don't forget that they don't all map to the same HCCs. Some of the DM codes capture 2 HCC categories. For example, E11.51 will map to 18 and 108. If they don't bother adding the E11.51 because they already added E11.65, then they'll miss out on capturing HCC 108.
 
Thank you. And yes, I've tried to get this across to the point where I was second guessing myself and that is why I asked. Appreciate your support.
 
I have not seen this asked yet, If a patient has had hyperglycemia in the past, but their DM is stable, would you use the ICD-10 code E11.9 or E11.65 (controlled)?
 
I have not seen this asked yet, If a patient has had hyperglycemia in the past, but their DM is stable, would you use the ICD-10 code E11.9 or E11.65 (controlled)?
Hello,
If the provider has documented hyperglycemia in the past, on a PMH or PL, this would be a history of then. With the DM documented as stable, I would capture E119.
 
Top