• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Bimalleolar equivalent fracture

sugarjoe

Contributor
Messages
17
Location
Lexington, MI
Best answers
0
A patient presents with a bimalleolar equivalent fracture and only the lateral malleolus is reduced and then fixed with internal fixation. There was no need to do a deltoid ligament repair so a cast was applied to immobilize and allow it to heal. Does this count as a 27814 Open treatment of bimalleolar ankle fracture? If so, why? Thanks in advance.
 
If there is a fracture on the lateral side, but not the medial side, I would bill 27792. There are times when one side needs ORIF and the opposite side needs to be watched. That to me is more of a "bimalleolar equivalent" fracture. If there is no fracture to watch on the medial side to make sure that it is healing correctly I vote 27792.
 
I agree with True Blue. A bimalleolar equivalent fracture is a fracture of one of the malleoli and an injured ligament, such as a syndesmosis disruption. In which case you would bill for treatment of the malleolar fracture, and if there was repair of a ligament, you would bill for that also.
 
Top