Advanced Search

Urology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Choose Your Coding Poison Based on Documentation

Published on Tue Jul 01, 2003

Question: How should I decide whether managing excessive bleeding that requires extra physician time and effort during a procedure warrants the use of modifier -22 or a critical care code?

Florida Subscriber

 Answer: Review of documentation is vital for coding  the control of bleeding.

 Forget about modifier -22 if bleeding complicates an E/M service. You can append modifier -22 only to surgical CPT codes. Usually, you use modifier -22 because of excessive bleeding that is a direct result of the procedure the physician is performing.

 Circumstances definitely exist when a critical care code is more appropriate than modifier -22 for the control of bleeding, e.g., when the physician is controlling bleeding for a patient who is critically ill whose condition is potentially life-threatening if the bleeding continues.

 CPT codes that represent the control of bleeding during a procedure typically represent endoscopic techniques for treating bleeding such as application of cautery with heater probe or bipolar or monopolar probe. You should use these control-of-bleeding codes only when a wound is actively bleeding. Otherwise, consider using modifier -22. You can't use control-of-bleeding codes if the physician induces the bleeding during a procedure.

Test Yourself and Reader Questions reviewed by Catherine Brink, CMM, CPC, president of Healthcare Resource Management Inc. in Spring Lake, N.J.

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All