Advanced Search

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Unnecessary Mod 52 Use Could Subtract From Your Bottom Line

Published on Mon Feb 22, 2016

You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:

Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Related Articles

CCI 20.0: New Codes 49406 and 49407 Among Non-Mutually Exclusive Edits You Must Implement Now

Op Note: Engage These 3 Challenges for a Clean Endometrial Cancer Surgery Claim

Hysterectomy Coding, Part 2: Cut the Errors Out of Your Hysterectomy Combination Coding With This Expert Advice

Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

ICD-10:
Explore Your "Exposure for the Zika Virus" Diagnosis Coding Options
Here’s what diagnoses to use for confirmed case ultrasounds. According to the World Health Organization, [...]

News You Can Use:
Add These 2 New HCPCS Codes to Your IUS Options
Delete this old HCPCS code from your potential options. If your practice sees patient for [...]

Coding Quiz:
Determine When You Can Bill Visits Outside You Global Ob Packages
Key: Was ob-gyn monitoring the pregnancy? Do you know whether you should include or exclude [...]

Subscriber Feedback:
Stay Tuned for News About Vaginal Hysterectomy + Colporrhaphy Edit
The AUGS submitted a letter objecting to this edit. A subscriber recently contacted us about [...]

Reader Question:
ER Admission Matters to POS
Question: My ob-gyn was performing rounds at the hospital. He got a page that an established [...]

Reader Question:
Count Oocytes to Use 89280-89281
Question: Codes 89280 and 89281 don’t have a Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edit, but payers are [...]

Reader Question:
Decipher Column 1, Column 2 CCI Codes
Question: Sometimes I cannot find the two codes I intend to bill in the CCI edits. [...]

Reader Question:
Use 58662 For Ovary Part Destruction
Question: Our ob-gyn did a laparoscopy with aspiration of one ovarian cyst and then drilled both [...]

Reader Question:
Reflect Both Unlisted and Listed Laparoscopic Procedures
Question: My physician performed a laparoscopic radical parametrectomy, upper vaginectomy, and a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patient [...]

Reader Question:
Consider 10021 for FNA Without U/S
Question: My ob-gyn performed the following procedure: Office pelvic ultrasound revealed solid and cystic components. Verbal [...]

Reader Question:
Unnecessary Mod 52 Use Could Subtract From Your Bottom Line
Question: My ob-gyn saw a patient with ovarian cancer. He performed a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilateral [...]

Reader Question:
Follow-Up BC Visits? Decide Between 99401-94404, 99211-99215
Question: Our providers have our patients come back to our ob-gyn office after three months of [...]

You Be the Coder:
Diagnosis for Pre-Eclampsia No Longer Present
Question: How do you code for a postpartum follow-up visit for a patient who had gestational [...]

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.