Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
You Be the Coder:
Diagnosis for Pre-Eclampsia No Longer Present
Published on Mon Feb 22, 2016
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
- Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
- Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
- Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
- Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
- 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
- The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
- ICD-10:
Explore Your "Exposure for the Zika Virus" Diagnosis Coding Options
Here’s what diagnoses to use for confirmed case ultrasounds. According to the World Health Organization, [...] - News You Can Use:
Add These 2 New HCPCS Codes to Your IUS Options
Delete this old HCPCS code from your potential options. If your practice sees patient for [...] - Coding Quiz:
Determine When You Can Bill Visits Outside You Global Ob Packages
Key: Was ob-gyn monitoring the pregnancy? Do you know whether you should include or exclude [...] - Subscriber Feedback:
Stay Tuned for News About Vaginal Hysterectomy + Colporrhaphy Edit
The AUGS submitted a letter objecting to this edit. A subscriber recently contacted us about [...] - Reader Question:
ER Admission Matters to POS
Question: My ob-gyn was performing rounds at the hospital. He got a page that an established [...] - Reader Question:
Count Oocytes to Use 89280-89281
Question: Codes 89280 and 89281 don’t have a Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edit, but payers are [...] - Reader Question:
Decipher Column 1, Column 2 CCI Codes
Question: Sometimes I cannot find the two codes I intend to bill in the CCI edits. [...] - Reader Question:
Use 58662 For Ovary Part Destruction
Question: Our ob-gyn did a laparoscopy with aspiration of one ovarian cyst and then drilled both [...] - Reader Question:
Reflect Both Unlisted and Listed Laparoscopic Procedures
Question: My physician performed a laparoscopic radical parametrectomy, upper vaginectomy, and a bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. Patient [...] - Reader Question:
Consider 10021 for FNA Without U/S
Question: My ob-gyn performed the following procedure: Office pelvic ultrasound revealed solid and cystic components. Verbal [...] - Reader Question:
Unnecessary Mod 52 Use Could Subtract From Your Bottom Line
Question: My ob-gyn saw a patient with ovarian cancer. He performed a total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), bilateral [...] - Reader Question:
Follow-Up BC Visits? Decide Between 99401-94404, 99211-99215
Question: Our providers have our patients come back to our ob-gyn office after three months of [...] - You Be the Coder:
Diagnosis for Pre-Eclampsia No Longer Present
Question: How do you code for a postpartum follow-up visit for a patient who had gestational [...]
View All
