• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Z01.30 and Z01.31

Messages
4
Location
Frisco, TX
Best answers
0
Hello, can someone help me break down this scenario? My employer is requiring coders to add Z01.30 or Z01.31 to every claim that includes a CPT II code for blood pressure measurement in order to meet a state quality metric.

My questions are:

  • Should the provider be required to document whether the blood pressure is normal or abnormal in the medical record for the coder to assign these diagnosis codes?
  • I do not feel comfortable basing code selection solely on the blood pressure value that is automatically generated in the documentation without explicit provider assessment.
  • Additionally, according to coding guidelines, if the blood pressure is abnormal, there should be an additional diagnosis code to capture the abnormal finding.
I would appreciate any guidance or insight on whether this practice is compliant with coding standards.
 
Hello, can someone help me break down this scenario? My employer is requiring coders to add Z01.30 or Z01.31 to every claim that includes a CPT II code for blood pressure measurement in order to meet a state quality metric.

My questions are:

  • Should the provider be required to document whether the blood pressure is normal or abnormal in the medical record for the coder to assign these diagnosis codes?
  • I do not feel comfortable basing code selection solely on the blood pressure value that is automatically generated in the documentation without explicit provider assessment.
  • Additionally, according to coding guidelines, if the blood pressure is abnormal, there should be an additional diagnosis code to capture the abnormal finding.
I would appreciate any guidance or insight on whether this practice is compliant with coding standards.


  • I do not feel comfortable basing code selection solely on the blood pressure value that is automatically generated in the documentation without explicit provider assessment.
A coder should not do that. We do not code from lab or blood pressure values. We assign codes based on what the provider has stated about those values.
 
Top