Hello all,
I have a question related to Pathology and the "specimen" as a definition. We are in the process of an internal audit and the issue that has come up is why we are able to charge the 88300 CPT code for a gross-only on a specimen that is not a "tissue". Specifically in regards to a stone that was part of a bladder workup from the OR (multiple specimens) and the stone was a gross-only and then sent for chemical analysis.
Basically the auditor is stating that the CPT manual defines the use of 88300 - 88309 as for a TISSUE and a bladder stone is NOT a tissue.
Additionally we also use the 88300 for medical devices removed at surgery, breast implants, teeth, etc. and any other specimen requested as a gross-only.
Does anyone have any experience with this sort of interpretation of a specimen as a biological tissue and/or can you think of any other source I can use as basis for our charge? I already referred to Dennis Padget and they are still looking for something more "official".
Thanks in advance!
Laura
I have a question related to Pathology and the "specimen" as a definition. We are in the process of an internal audit and the issue that has come up is why we are able to charge the 88300 CPT code for a gross-only on a specimen that is not a "tissue". Specifically in regards to a stone that was part of a bladder workup from the OR (multiple specimens) and the stone was a gross-only and then sent for chemical analysis.
Basically the auditor is stating that the CPT manual defines the use of 88300 - 88309 as for a TISSUE and a bladder stone is NOT a tissue.
Additionally we also use the 88300 for medical devices removed at surgery, breast implants, teeth, etc. and any other specimen requested as a gross-only.
Does anyone have any experience with this sort of interpretation of a specimen as a biological tissue and/or can you think of any other source I can use as basis for our charge? I already referred to Dennis Padget and they are still looking for something more "official".
Thanks in advance!
Laura