deborahcook4040
Networker
an uneventful lap chole with grams was performed - at the end, my phsycian repaired a 15 cm abdominal wall defect near the umbilicus, which she is calling a hernia. There is no hernia sac to excise. There is nothing protruding through the defect. The relevant portion of the op report goes as follows: "The trocars were removed and the pneumoperitoneum expelled. The fascial defect at the umbilicus was then mobilized. The fascial edges were mobilized using cautery to raise flaps circumferentially. The defect was about 15 cm. The fascial edges were mobilized and reapproximated transversely and closed using running #1 Vicryl. Subcutaneous tissues were irrigated and closed using running 3-0 Vicryl. The skin edges were then closed with running subcuticular 4-0 Vicryl. Prior to closing the skin a pursestring suture of 3-0 Vicryl was placed at the umbilical skin and this was tacked down to the subcutaneous. A sterile pressure dressing was applied."
Should I code this as an intermediate repair or an umbilical hernia repair with a 59 modifier? Usually an umbilical hernia repair would be bundled into the lap chole unless it was incarcerated, but this defect was so big that it seems like it should be seperated out due to the amount of work involved. The defect also predated the procedure and was not involved.
Thanks,
Debby
Should I code this as an intermediate repair or an umbilical hernia repair with a 59 modifier? Usually an umbilical hernia repair would be bundled into the lap chole unless it was incarcerated, but this defect was so big that it seems like it should be seperated out due to the amount of work involved. The defect also predated the procedure and was not involved.
Thanks,
Debby