ollielooya
True Blue
I posted a similar question back in early 2014 RE 20610 and 64418 and an esteemed forum member advised that billing the more expensive procedure would probably be a better way to go since 64418 is bundled into 20610 (64418 pays more). But now with the new modifier subsets I've been asked if billing both would be possible utilizing the new XS modifier. My response is still no.
Frankly, I'm stalled with the billing for the procedures below and of course bump up against the NCCI edits. Can't unbundle with the XS because it's in the same anatomical area. I'm waiting on the chart notes, but would it be acceptable to bill the 64418 and the 76942 with the 716.61 diagnoses along with the medication and omit the 20610 and 77002 altogether?
My confidence is a little shaky with these type of scenarios and my physician awaits an answer.
20610-LT 715.91
77002-LT 715.91
64418 XS-LT 716.61
76942-LT 716.31
J code for medication
Frankly, I'm stalled with the billing for the procedures below and of course bump up against the NCCI edits. Can't unbundle with the XS because it's in the same anatomical area. I'm waiting on the chart notes, but would it be acceptable to bill the 64418 and the 76942 with the 716.61 diagnoses along with the medication and omit the 20610 and 77002 altogether?
My confidence is a little shaky with these type of scenarios and my physician awaits an answer.
20610-LT 715.91
77002-LT 715.91
64418 XS-LT 716.61
76942-LT 716.31
J code for medication