scurcic
New
Two part question regarding review of system statement.
1- We have a difference of opinion regarding the "10 point ROS reviewed and negative except in HPI" statement. Some feel the following "10 systems reviewed and negative other than pertinent positives and negatives as indicated per history of present illness" is acceptable others feel we should avoid using this statement and word it more like "all other systems negative except as noted in the HPI". Are both of these acceptable, especially to North Carolina MAC?
2- Should the HPI statement be one which is frowned upon, if the rest of the chart supports a 99285 (including HPI, PE; only the ROS has unacceptable verbiage), would it automatically become a 99284 based on this one issue? Or can a provider be queried with an "incomplete history" request.
1- We have a difference of opinion regarding the "10 point ROS reviewed and negative except in HPI" statement. Some feel the following "10 systems reviewed and negative other than pertinent positives and negatives as indicated per history of present illness" is acceptable others feel we should avoid using this statement and word it more like "all other systems negative except as noted in the HPI". Are both of these acceptable, especially to North Carolina MAC?
2- Should the HPI statement be one which is frowned upon, if the rest of the chart supports a 99285 (including HPI, PE; only the ROS has unacceptable verbiage), would it automatically become a 99284 based on this one issue? Or can a provider be queried with an "incomplete history" request.