egraham1827
Contributor
There has been a lot of discussion in my office about how to properly sequence diagnosis codes for radiation therapy. The ICD-9 guidelines are not black and white when it comes to treating a metastasis. For treatment directed at a secondary site, it only states that the treatment site is the principal diagnosis (which we of course agree with); however, it does not state whether the primary site also needs to be on the claim as the second dx code. Most of my co-workers are not coders so it is difficult to explain to them why we also need to put the primary site on the claim when that is not the area we are treating.
So the question is: When treating a metastatic site, does the primary site also need to be on the claim, whether still active or not? Any clarification/guidance on this would be greatly appreciated!! If you can provide your source as well that would be helpful so I can take the information to my supervisor.
Thank you in advance for your help!!!![Smile :) :)]()
So the question is: When treating a metastatic site, does the primary site also need to be on the claim, whether still active or not? Any clarification/guidance on this would be greatly appreciated!! If you can provide your source as well that would be helpful so I can take the information to my supervisor.
Thank you in advance for your help!!!