• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki R39.14 vs R33.8

LAT93

Guest
Messages
22
Location
Yakima, WA
Best answers
0
Here is an example of documentation with some of our providers:
1695320414079.png
They also sometimes say something like: PVR of 68 mL indicating incomplete bladder emptying.

Here is the link that I am referring to:


Thoughts? I started coding retention until some of the providers started using the bold phrase above. I don't know if it's a word around what we are being instructed. I would appreciate any guidance on how to tackle this.

Thank you!
 
I know this is from a long time ago and you've probably received some guidance on this question, but thought I'd throw in my two cents.

If you go to the ICD-10 book and look up "Incomplete," then go down to "bladder, emptying," it will direct you to either r33.8 or r33.9, I can't remember which. This is the code I would use.

I see how it is confusing, because the providers are essentially saying the patient is not completely emptying their bladder without necessarily having acute urinary retention. But according to the ICD-10, whether the provider documents it as "incomplete bladder emptying" or "urinary retention," the code is the same.
 
Top