If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
depends on what was visualized. did he selectively engage the right subclavian and only image that artery? if the vertebral wasn't imaged and/or was not the point of the study then 36225 wouldn't be appropriate. if he was looking at stenosis in the right subclavian (especially if it was proximal) then I would expect him to engage the innominate or even stay in the aortic arch to inject dye and watch the runoff through the subclavian
no, 36225 would not be correct unless the vertebral artery was visualized and the OP did not mention that. They said only the subclavian was visualized. We really aren't getting enough information from them to code this accurately.