My question is: If a new patient comes to the office for a preventive service and there is an acute visit also -would the acute visit be a new patient ie. 99201-99205 or an established 99213 - 99215. According to the CPT Assistant - When a patients presents for a "new" visit the patient would be new until they leave the office. Is there a more up to date policy. Thanks
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Preventive with E/M Code
- Thread starter Crystal H
- Start date
New pt seen for a physical and E & M 99381-99384 (kids) 99385- 99387 (Adults) will use 99201 - 99205 with the 25 modifier on the E&M, Pt new for this visit.
Pam Warren
True Blue
Sorry, I disagree. A patient can be new only once within a three year period. The preventive visit is coded as a new patient, with the office visit as an established patient, with the -25.
As always, I welcome discussion! Pam
As always, I welcome discussion! Pam
dballard2004
True Blue
I respectfully disagree. Per CPT definition, a new patient is one who has not received professional services within three years. If a new patient presents for a preventative exam and an additional complaint is addressed in the same encounter, three years has not gone by. So they would still be considered a new patient. You would report both as new patient encounters. CPT Assistant address this very issue in the October 2006 issue and states plainly that both encounters in this situation should be reported with a new patient preventative E/M and a new patient office/outpatient E/M code.
This is how CPT advises you would report this type of encounter, but third-party payers may have different reporting requirements, so I would suggest you consult with this specific payer.
This is how CPT advises you would report this type of encounter, but third-party payers may have different reporting requirements, so I would suggest you consult with this specific payer.
Pam Warren
True Blue
In order to bill the new patient office visit with the new patient preventive, you'd have to double dip in the exam component to meet all three key components.
Is this now acceptable?
We typically ask our providers to clearly document HPI elements that correspond with Assessment/Plan details in order to support an established OV. Any lab/rad/medicine data must relate to the complaints in the HPI, and we also expect to see significant additional work. That is, of course, the criteria for appending the -25.
Is this now acceptable?
We typically ask our providers to clearly document HPI elements that correspond with Assessment/Plan details in order to support an established OV. Any lab/rad/medicine data must relate to the complaints in the HPI, and we also expect to see significant additional work. That is, of course, the criteria for appending the -25.
Lisa Bledsoe
True Blue
I agree with Pam. Although there has been a lot of discussion on this scenario in the past and most of us have agreed to disagree on how we view it; payors usually will not pay for two new visits on the same day. A patient is new once on that date, so the preventive is new and the problem-oriented would be established.
dballard2004
True Blue
Pam,
I do see your point....but,
If the additional complaint was indeed significant and required an additional E/M, then in most cases would you not have separate key components? To me a separate complaint would be (in most cases) a separate exam (although it may be limited), so you would not necessarily be douple-dipping.
While I do understand Pam and Lisa's point of view, three years has not elapsed between visits,couple that with CPT guidance, and both encounters would be coded with new patient prevenative and new patient office visit E/M codes.
Again, your payer may see it in a different light, but this is how CPT recommends it is to be done.
I do see your point....but,
If the additional complaint was indeed significant and required an additional E/M, then in most cases would you not have separate key components? To me a separate complaint would be (in most cases) a separate exam (although it may be limited), so you would not necessarily be douple-dipping.
While I do understand Pam and Lisa's point of view, three years has not elapsed between visits,couple that with CPT guidance, and both encounters would be coded with new patient prevenative and new patient office visit E/M codes.
Again, your payer may see it in a different light, but this is how CPT recommends it is to be done.