Wiki PLEASE HELP! fellow cardio coders

1formissy

Guru
Messages
236
Location
Albany, OR
Best answers
0
Hello All,

I really need some help on this OP report. I have an office appealing the original decision we made on a claim, (I am on the payers side), and I want to make sure I understand the procedures which were performed. Could someone please take a look at this report, and let me know how you would code it? I would REALLY APPRECIATE IT!
:confused:
This is how the provider's office is reporting the claim. (MUE's 92928 is only 1)
92928-LD
92928-RC
93458-26
**************************

Indication: Angina with prior coronary stenting.

Name of Procedures:
Left Heart Catheterization
Selective coronary artery angiography
Left ventriculography
PTCA and stenting of the PDA
PTCA and stenting of the diagonal branch
Radiological supervision and interpretation
Conscious sedation

CORONARY ARTERY ANGIOGRAPHY: Left main: There is calcification noted in the walls of the left main without any area of ciritcal stenosis.

Left enterior descending artery: There was calcification noted in the walls of the left anterior descending aretery without any area of signifiant stenosis.

There is a moderate size first diagonal branch, which has an in-stent restenosis of 90%. A 2.5 x 16 mm drug-eluding stent was deployed with 0% residual stenosis.

Left circumflex artery: Left circumflex artery and its OM branches had minor irregularities.

Right coronary artery is a large right dominant right coronary artery. There is a stent noted in the mid RCA. There is an area of in-stent restenosis of 30% to 40%. The PL branch had a 90% lesion, which was stented using a 2.75 x 20 mm drug-eluting stent with 0% residual stenosis. The PDA had minor irregularities. Left ventriculography showed an ejection fraction of 45% to 50%. There was no gradient across the LVOT.
 
Hi!
I code for two interventional cardiologists and I would want more information in the cath report :)

I would question the 93458-26... was the previous cath report available? Did the patient have new symptoms to warrant the cath? If it isn't documented, it should not be billed.

As far as the other codes, I would code it as 92928-LD, 92928-59-RC because the stents were put into two different vessels.

Jennifer Everett, CPC
 
Hello All,

I really need some help on this OP report. I have an office appealing the original decision we made on a claim, (I am on the payers side), and I want to make sure I understand the procedures which were performed. Could someone please take a look at this report, and let me know how you would code it? I would REALLY APPRECIATE IT!
:confused:
This is how the provider's office is reporting the claim. (MUE's 92928 is only 1)
92928-LD
92928-RC
93458-26
**************************

Indication: Angina with prior coronary stenting.

Name of Procedures:
Left Heart Catheterization
Selective coronary artery angiography
Left ventriculography
PTCA and stenting of the PDA
PTCA and stenting of the diagonal branch
Radiological supervision and interpretation
Conscious sedation

CORONARY ARTERY ANGIOGRAPHY: Left main: There is calcification noted in the walls of the left main without any area of ciritcal stenosis.

Left enterior descending artery: There was calcification noted in the walls of the left anterior descending aretery without any area of signifiant stenosis.

There is a moderate size first diagonal branch, which has an in-stent restenosis of 90%. A 2.5 x 16 mm drug-eluding stent was deployed with 0% residual stenosis.

Left circumflex artery: Left circumflex artery and its OM branches had minor irregularities.

Right coronary artery is a large right dominant right coronary artery. There is a stent noted in the mid RCA. There is an area of in-stent restenosis of 30% to 40%. The PL branch had a 90% lesion, which was stented using a 2.75 x 20 mm drug-eluting stent with 0% residual stenosis. The PDA had minor irregularities. Left ventriculography showed an ejection fraction of 45% to 50%. There was no gradient across the LVOT.



You do need the procedure detail but if everything was documented correctly 93458.26 needs an XU
 
Hi!
I code for two interventional cardiologists and I would want more information in the cath report :)

I would question the 93458-26... was the previous cath report available? Did the patient have new symptoms to warrant the cath? If it isn't documented, it should not be billed.

As far as the other codes, I would code it as 92928-LD, 92928-59-RC because the stents were put into two different vessels.

Jennifer Everett, CPC

Hi Jennifer,
What I put in the body of my original question is the only information I recieved from the provider. I agree with you, and thank you for your help!
 
93458-26, 59
92928-ld
92929-rc

xu is not required by medicare as of yet and mod 59 is still appropriate
 
The claim is coded correctly. The guidelines tell us to bill 92928 for each initial stent to major artery or branch of. There are 2 separate stents in 2 separate major artery branches documented in addition to LHC.

HTH :)
 
Top