• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement without reason for placement - what ICD-10 do you assign?

whatwouldyousay

Networker
Messages
48
Location
South Bend, IN
Best answers
0
Is a gastrostomy considered a GI device? If so I would assign Z46.59 Is gastrostomy considered a catheter? If so I would assign Z46.82 I do not feel Z43.1 is appropriate since that is an aftercare code used for an existing gastrostomy. Please let me know your thoughts! o_O
 
Is a gastrostomy considered a GI device? If so I would assign Z46.59 Is gastrostomy considered a catheter? If so I would assign Z46.82 I do not feel Z43.1 is appropriate since that is an aftercare code used for an existing gastrostomy. Please let me know your thoughts! o_O
Yes, it's a GI device. What does the op report state as the reason for the procedure?
 
Yes, it's a GI device. What does the op report state as the reason for the procedure?
Thanks Lisa! This is a report I am auditing so I am trying to respond to the audit appropriately for this report which lacks any indication, reason, or history for the coder to use. Z43.1 was assigned but I lean to assign Z46.59.
 
Thanks Lisa! This is a report I am auditing so I am trying to respond to the audit appropriately for this report which lacks any indication, reason, or history for the coder to use. Z43.1 was assigned but I lean to assign Z46.59.
I agree with your rationale, Z46.59 is more appropriate for the placement of the device whereas Z43.1 is for evaluation or maintenance of an existing device. But personally, I would consider the record to be deficient if no diagnosis or reason for the procedure was documented and would have recommended a query to the provider rather than using either of these codes.
 
I agree with your rationale, Z46.59 is more appropriate for the placement of the device whereas Z43.1 is for evaluation or maintenance of an existing device. But personally, I would consider the record to be deficient if no diagnosis or reason for the procedure was documented and would have recommended a query to the provider rather than using either of these codes.
I agree. Because I was auditing the previously coded report I was only trying to determine how to respond to the codes assigned in the situation. Thanks for responding, @thomas7331 :)
 
Top