drewbart@sbcglobal.net
Contributor
- Messages
- 13
- Best answers
- 0
Hi,
Can someone share the hierarchy order in which payor systems review claims with regards to tax ID, taxonomy. We are seeing many inclusive related denials and I am trying to understand the order in which a claim is reviewed by payors. Is it 1. Billing provider NPI, tax ID and taxonomy 2. Service Provider NPI, taxonomy
I believe that some of our inclusive denials are really an issue of the taxonomies bumping each other. Some providers taxonomies are not reflective of the true specialty charge. ( IE. A general surgeon who also works a critical care/Trauma specialty bills 99291, claim is sent with GS taxonomy)
I appreciate any information someone can share. Thank you!
Can someone share the hierarchy order in which payor systems review claims with regards to tax ID, taxonomy. We are seeing many inclusive related denials and I am trying to understand the order in which a claim is reviewed by payors. Is it 1. Billing provider NPI, tax ID and taxonomy 2. Service Provider NPI, taxonomy
I believe that some of our inclusive denials are really an issue of the taxonomies bumping each other. Some providers taxonomies are not reflective of the true specialty charge. ( IE. A general surgeon who also works a critical care/Trauma specialty bills 99291, claim is sent with GS taxonomy)
I appreciate any information someone can share. Thank you!