- Messages
- 5
- Best answers
- 0
Dear Fellow AAPC members,
I am working with a pathology firm. The compliance aadvice is, "When there is nothing on the requisition but OPEN WOUND, there is a need to contact the referring provider for detail information". I believe this is a waste of time for the S91.xxxx series of codes because I am under the impression that the Initial encounter or subsequent encounter pertains to the provider providing the service not the provider tending to the wound. We are providing Pathology services. If we bill a subsequent or sequel what will stop the payor from denying waiting on the initial?? And possibly more important, I am thinking that because we are a pathology company everything we do is diagnostic and we have the result diagnosis and that should be the primary...Am I wrong!
please advise
I am working with a pathology firm. The compliance aadvice is, "When there is nothing on the requisition but OPEN WOUND, there is a need to contact the referring provider for detail information". I believe this is a waste of time for the S91.xxxx series of codes because I am under the impression that the Initial encounter or subsequent encounter pertains to the provider providing the service not the provider tending to the wound. We are providing Pathology services. If we bill a subsequent or sequel what will stop the payor from denying waiting on the initial?? And possibly more important, I am thinking that because we are a pathology company everything we do is diagnostic and we have the result diagnosis and that should be the primary...Am I wrong!
please advise