mstoop1
Contributor
Is there any reason why a co-suregon would not be permitted to bill 63650 and/or 63685??
Thanks for any help!
Thanks for any help!
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Neurostimulator co-surgeon
- Thread starter mstoop1
- Start date
FTessaBartels
Guest
Check CCI edits
Check your CCI edits. 63650 does not allow the 62 modifier. 63685 does.
But do not code for reimbursement. Code what was performed.
F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
Check your CCI edits. 63650 does not allow the 62 modifier. 63685 does.
But do not code for reimbursement. Code what was performed.
F Tessa Bartels, CPC, CEMC
RebeccaWoodward*
True Blue
Mstoop1,
Our sugeons also provide these services. I am told, simply, that CPT code 63650 is not complex enough to warrant an additional assistant; whereas, 63685 could with medically necessary documentation.
Our sugeons also provide these services. I am told, simply, that CPT code 63650 is not complex enough to warrant an additional assistant; whereas, 63685 could with medically necessary documentation.