mellodycottage
Guest
- Messages
- 6
- Best answers
- 0
I need to know if it is acceptable to code dysplasia of the prostate as 233.4? When I look in the neoplasm table, that code is for a malignant neoplasm of the prostate in-situ.
All of these pathology reports come back as negative and may site 1 or 2 cores positive for high grade pin, but they do not specify Pin 1,2 or 3. I think what we are seeing is a general term (high grade pin) that is used rather than for the actual Dx. of high grade pin 3.
Ex: (Is it Kleenex vs. Puffs Plus kind of a thing) Does anyone have any information regarding coding in situ in this situation ?
I am leary of coding a malignancy in a patient with a negetive path report.
Thanks for the help. ~ Donna
All of these pathology reports come back as negative and may site 1 or 2 cores positive for high grade pin, but they do not specify Pin 1,2 or 3. I think what we are seeing is a general term (high grade pin) that is used rather than for the actual Dx. of high grade pin 3.
Ex: (Is it Kleenex vs. Puffs Plus kind of a thing) Does anyone have any information regarding coding in situ in this situation ?
I am leary of coding a malignancy in a patient with a negetive path report.
Thanks for the help. ~ Donna