Hello!
I have a question about CPT code 15852. The description reads "dressing change (for other than burns) under anethesia (other than local)." I am reviewing op notes for a date of service of 12/28/09 and the assesment states: 1. Superficial Debridment right foot , 2. Application of sterile dressing.
It appears that on 12/22/09 a different physician treated the patient for 28825 "partial amputation of the toe" and also was treated for 11043 "skin debridment-subcutaneous skin, muscle".
The physician who billed for services provided on 12/28/09 only billed 15852, and I am being questioned as to why the physician does not bill for a debridment procedure also. I noticed that the intial procedures performed on 12/22/09 have a 90 day and a 10 day global period, so is that why the physian is only billing for the dressing change? Wouldn't the dressing change (15852) be considered/included as part of the debridment procedure (11043) anyways; or is it considered separate procedure to bill since anesthesia had to be administered?
Any thoughts on this one??
I have a question about CPT code 15852. The description reads "dressing change (for other than burns) under anethesia (other than local)." I am reviewing op notes for a date of service of 12/28/09 and the assesment states: 1. Superficial Debridment right foot , 2. Application of sterile dressing.
It appears that on 12/22/09 a different physician treated the patient for 28825 "partial amputation of the toe" and also was treated for 11043 "skin debridment-subcutaneous skin, muscle".
The physician who billed for services provided on 12/28/09 only billed 15852, and I am being questioned as to why the physician does not bill for a debridment procedure also. I noticed that the intial procedures performed on 12/22/09 have a 90 day and a 10 day global period, so is that why the physian is only billing for the dressing change? Wouldn't the dressing change (15852) be considered/included as part of the debridment procedure (11043) anyways; or is it considered separate procedure to bill since anesthesia had to be administered?
Any thoughts on this one??