Yes when the joint is stressed under fluoro with ligamentous rupture and the report states, "reduced the joint", that's what this code is for in my opinion. What does the header say?In your opinion is there enough details to support 26706 since there's no mention of fracture, but stressing of the joint and complete rupture of RCL w/pinning, would that support dislocation, or a avulsion fracture?
If you are billing for the facility, I would not code 77071 unless your payer contract specifically states you can. I know as an ASC I don't bill for fluoro unless it is work comp. All other payers bundle it as inclusive or state they don't pay for radiology codes.77071 I thought could only be billed in office setting
I meant if you are doing physician/surgeon bill not facility. 77071 is specifically for professional service only. It doesn't have a TC/PC. It is packaged in ASC.If you are billing for the facility, I would not code 77071 unless your payer contract specifically states you can. I know as an ASC I don't bill for fluoro unless it is work comp. All other payers bundle it as inclusive or state they don't pay for radiology codes.