- Messages
- 1
- Best answers
- 0
One of my providers recently performed what he called a laparoscopic bilateral tubal ligation in which he transected and removed a portion of each tube. I coded this as 58670 based on AAPC's Codify description which states he may remove a portion of the tubes to send to pathology. However, the hospital billed this as 58661. I reached out to the hospital but they are sticking with their coding of 58661. In the body of his note he stated that a partial salpingectomy of each tube was performed. I am not sure if that is why the hospital billed as 58661 but Codify's description of 58661 says one or both tubes and/or one or both ovaries are removed. It doesn't say a portion of them. We only bill 58661 for a sterilizations if the entire tube is removed. I have to provide my providers with guidance going forward and want to make sure we are coding their procedures correctly and also preventing very upset patients when they receive their bills. This patient's insurance paid our claim and left no patient responsibility, but she received a $7K bill from the hospital for their charge of 58661. We have done the same procedure many times before billing as 58670 with no issues for our patients, the only difference being the wording in the body of this op note stating "partial salpingectomy" instead of saying "removed a portion of each tube". Thanks for any input on this subject.