• If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten the password it can be reset on our sign in section by entering your registered Email Address or Username here. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..

Wiki IV Guidelines for Charging CPT 96366 following CPT 96367 - How should I charge?

Pvdcoder

Contributor
Messages
23
Location
Providence
Best answers
0
Hello,
My question is, if a patient in the ED received multiple IV drug infusions and one of the drugs only ran for 63 minutes, would I charge 96367 alone or do I add 96366 because it ran over 60 minutes? Here are the drugs that were given:

Patient was in the ER from 03/01/18 to 03/02/18


Infusions:

Vancomycin 3/1 2059-2336 total of 157 minutes
Azactam 3/1 2207-0024 total of 137 minutes
Mag Sulfate 3/1 2337-0129 total of 112 minutes
Flagyl 3/2 0026-0129 total of 63 minutes

I would charge it this way: Vanco - 96365 & 96366 x 2, Azactam – 96367 & 96366 x 1, Mag Sulfate – 96367 & 96366 x 1 and Flagyl – 96367.

I am being told that I should add CPT 96366 to the Flagyl charge because it ran over 63 minutes but I thought in order to charge 96366 it had to run at least 91 minutes. Does it only have to run over 60 minutes when charging a sequential infusion (96367) to add the subsequent (96366) charge? Can someone please explain if I should have charged the 96366 and why?
 
Infusion Charging

Since you did not specify, I'm going to assume that this patient had only one vascular access site. I think you've got a very good idea of what should be charged. I just have one change and will try to answer your questions as well.

With that, you would charge this:

Vanco 3/1 96365 x1 and 96366 x2
Azactam 3/1 96368 x1 because it ran concurrently with vanco and no separate IV line was indicated
Mag Sulfate 3/1 96367 x1 and 96366 x1
Flagyl 3/2 96367 x1. You can only report 96366 for infusion intervals of greater than 30 minutes beyond the 1 hour increments. So yes, the drug would need to run at least 31 minutes to charge 96366 for the same drug; no CPT 96366 supported in this case.

CPT 96367 is an additional sequential infusion of a new drug/substance, up to 1 hour. This would be used when a new drug/substance is being administered in the same vascular access line. As with the initial infusion, the drug/substance needs to run at least 16 minutes to charge.
 
Can anyone tell me for CPT 96367 is an additional sequential infusion of a new drug/substance minimum time with some referral notes.

For example:
Physician given two different drugs, drug A and Drug B. Drug A given at 12.00 PM to 2.00 PM and drug B is given at 2.05 PM to 2.25 PM.
Is that i have to code 96365, 96367, 96366 or 96365, 96366 and 96375?
 
Last edited:
Top