Jamie Claypool
New
- Messages
- 4
- Best answers
- 0
Hello anyone who can confirm or deny this thinking:
We represent a physician network and we have a physician who has an office in the hospital ( physician is employed through the physician network owned by the hospital). The hospital owns the space he is in but it is not part of the hospital campus. This physician is bringing patients from an inpatient setting to his office for treatment and testing. The equipment is in the physician office and he is sometimes giving treatment and testing ( his is a radiation oncologist). The hospital owns the equipment. He is using place of service 11 and we think this is not correct. The patient's in patient status has not changed and we think that by changing the place of service to "11" that there could be an overcharge situation because of the site of service differential. Should the place of service remain in-patient? Any advice or in put anyone can give me is truly appreciated.
Jamie
We represent a physician network and we have a physician who has an office in the hospital ( physician is employed through the physician network owned by the hospital). The hospital owns the space he is in but it is not part of the hospital campus. This physician is bringing patients from an inpatient setting to his office for treatment and testing. The equipment is in the physician office and he is sometimes giving treatment and testing ( his is a radiation oncologist). The hospital owns the equipment. He is using place of service 11 and we think this is not correct. The patient's in patient status has not changed and we think that by changing the place of service to "11" that there could be an overcharge situation because of the site of service differential. Should the place of service remain in-patient? Any advice or in put anyone can give me is truly appreciated.
Jamie