kumeena
True Blue
If doctor documented and coded for HL (272.4) and (272.1) is it OK to bill like that?
Thank you
Thank you
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki Hyperlipidemia
- Thread starter kumeena
- Start date
mitchellde
True Blue
it depends on what exactly the documentation states.
BeckyL1958
Guest
- Messages
- 21
- Best answers
- 0
272.1 is hyperglyceridemia, I looked it up and posted the definition below. If he documeted HL which is hyperlipidemia abbreviated, I would feel comfortable using 272.4 = unspecified hyperlipidema, but I would not use 272.1 without verifying with the doctor that this is actually what the patient has.
hyperglyceridemia
[-glī′səridē′mē·ə]
Etymology: Gk, hyper, glykys + haima, blood
an excess of glycerides, particularly triglycerides, in the blood. It is caused by a congenital defect in the ability to metabolize the amino acid glycine.
Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. © 2009, Elsevier.
hyperglyceridemia
[-glī′səridē′mē·ə]
Etymology: Gk, hyper, glykys + haima, blood
an excess of glycerides, particularly triglycerides, in the blood. It is caused by a congenital defect in the ability to metabolize the amino acid glycine.
Mosby's Medical Dictionary, 8th edition. © 2009, Elsevier.
kumeena
True Blue
Thank you .
kumeena
True Blue
HL and High TG was documented.
KaylaR2007
Contributor
272.4 definition indicates elevated cholesterol and triglycerides. I would use this code only for HL. If provider states hypertriglyceridemia, then use 272.1. You could use both if you have that statement, otherwise 272.4 is good enough 