kristy2
Contributor
I code for a plastic surgeon that does mostly breast reconstructions. On a few patients the surgeon has had to remove the tissue expanders that were placed during a previous surgery due to complications or infection. On almost all cases, he has opened the breast capsule, removed the expander, debridement of necrotic tissue attached a wound vac and followed patient closely for later insertion of expander or prosthesis.
I am puzzled coding these surgeries! In my opinion 19328 (removal of intact mammary implant) is not appropriate because they are expanders. 19380 (revision of reconstructed brst) is not appropriate because it is my understanding this is for correction to asymmetry.
I have coded for the removal of tissue expander (11970) with placement of wound vac (97606) in the past. However, we were disappointed in the reimbursement amounts. It was felt that the surgery was more involved and the surgeon should be reimbursed accordingly. So, we then tried billing with mod 22 (with supportive documentation) and even 19499 (unlisted procedure with supportive documentation). It was determined that billing the unlisted procedure with supportive documentation got us the best reasonable reimbursement for the procedures performed.
So.... my question is.... I find that I am spending a great deal of time writing these appeals and proof of documentation. Is there an easier way? Can we bill for the 19328 even though it's a tissue expander and not prosthesis?
I am puzzled coding these surgeries! In my opinion 19328 (removal of intact mammary implant) is not appropriate because they are expanders. 19380 (revision of reconstructed brst) is not appropriate because it is my understanding this is for correction to asymmetry.
I have coded for the removal of tissue expander (11970) with placement of wound vac (97606) in the past. However, we were disappointed in the reimbursement amounts. It was felt that the surgery was more involved and the surgeon should be reimbursed accordingly. So, we then tried billing with mod 22 (with supportive documentation) and even 19499 (unlisted procedure with supportive documentation). It was determined that billing the unlisted procedure with supportive documentation got us the best reasonable reimbursement for the procedures performed.
So.... my question is.... I find that I am spending a great deal of time writing these appeals and proof of documentation. Is there an easier way? Can we bill for the 19328 even though it's a tissue expander and not prosthesis?