Pillow1
Guru
IN JUNE OF 2010 THIS WAS THE QUESTION POSTED ON THE FORUM:
Wouldn't you code the REASON the echo was done as the diagnosis and not the RESULTS as the diagnosis? The results are after the fact, what was the reason the test was done?
THIS WAS THE ANSWER:
The final results are ALWAYS coded as the principal diagnosis. You would only code the signs and symptoms if the results are inconclusive and/or normal. AND you would NEVER use a rule out code.
WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE ADVISE IT THIS IS AN ACCURATE ANSWER AS I AM FACED WITH THE SAME DILEMMA ?
THE CONDENSED ECHO REPORT IS ATTACHED
INDICATION FOR EVALUATION: Valvular heart disease.
CONCLUSION:
1. Echocardiographic/Doppler study with technical limitation.
2. Overall, preserved left ventricular function.
3. Normal cardiac chamber size.
4. No pericardial effusion.
5. Trace-mild aortic insufficiency.
ANY FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED/ DENISE
Wouldn't you code the REASON the echo was done as the diagnosis and not the RESULTS as the diagnosis? The results are after the fact, what was the reason the test was done?
THIS WAS THE ANSWER:
The final results are ALWAYS coded as the principal diagnosis. You would only code the signs and symptoms if the results are inconclusive and/or normal. AND you would NEVER use a rule out code.
WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE ADVISE IT THIS IS AN ACCURATE ANSWER AS I AM FACED WITH THE SAME DILEMMA ?
THE CONDENSED ECHO REPORT IS ATTACHED
INDICATION FOR EVALUATION: Valvular heart disease.
CONCLUSION:
1. Echocardiographic/Doppler study with technical limitation.
2. Overall, preserved left ventricular function.
3. Normal cardiac chamber size.
4. No pericardial effusion.
5. Trace-mild aortic insufficiency.
ANY FEEDBACK IS GREATLY APPRECIATED/ DENISE
Last edited: