ni11235813
New
There is some disagreement in our office about whether dx T76.12 for suspected child abuse that has not yet been confirmed is an acceptable dx for an office visit.
The 5 y.o. child presented for a preventive visit in the company of his aunt. The provider documented details given by the aunt regarding child abuse perpetrated by the patient’s mother. The provider also documented the case number of the report made to CPS.
Based on these observations, I believe dx T76.12XA is appropriate. However, other coders in the office believe dx T76.12XA cannot be reported due the wording “suspected” child abuse. The POS for this visit is 50 for a FQHC clinic. I mention this because I do know dx from Z03 should only be reported in POS 22. (Or perhaps I’m wrong here too!)
Can anyone provide a definitive reference to confirm whether or not dx T76.12XA can be coded for this scenario?
Thank you!
The 5 y.o. child presented for a preventive visit in the company of his aunt. The provider documented details given by the aunt regarding child abuse perpetrated by the patient’s mother. The provider also documented the case number of the report made to CPS.
Based on these observations, I believe dx T76.12XA is appropriate. However, other coders in the office believe dx T76.12XA cannot be reported due the wording “suspected” child abuse. The POS for this visit is 50 for a FQHC clinic. I mention this because I do know dx from Z03 should only be reported in POS 22. (Or perhaps I’m wrong here too!)
Can anyone provide a definitive reference to confirm whether or not dx T76.12XA can be coded for this scenario?
Thank you!