bmeech
Networker
I see several articles on this issue, but still a bit confused. Dr. submitted Open ORIF (27759) + I&D to Bone (11012) + Exploration (20103), All the Same area. He states he is allowed to bill for Closure of this Open Fracture.
My thoughts: the Column 2 =20103 bundles with Column 1=11012, a 59 would not be allowed (same area). or if using closure code 13132 Becomes the Column 1 code and the 11012 Becomes the Column 2 code (?) I don't understand that. Article states "20103: Billable If wound required Enlargement...But the I&D + the reduction of the Fx was done through this extension. Then another article states "Closure will always bundle with debridment except if extensive undermining ( 20103 or 13132)?https://www.aapc.com/blog/26267-closure-coding-made-simple/ & https://www.aapc.com/blog/29508-removal-of-foreign-body-included-in-wound-explorations/
Thank you for your help as I work through my Friday morning brain.
My thoughts: the Column 2 =20103 bundles with Column 1=11012, a 59 would not be allowed (same area). or if using closure code 13132 Becomes the Column 1 code and the 11012 Becomes the Column 2 code (?) I don't understand that. Article states "20103: Billable If wound required Enlargement...But the I&D + the reduction of the Fx was done through this extension. Then another article states "Closure will always bundle with debridment except if extensive undermining ( 20103 or 13132)?https://www.aapc.com/blog/26267-closure-coding-made-simple/ & https://www.aapc.com/blog/29508-removal-of-foreign-body-included-in-wound-explorations/
Thank you for your help as I work through my Friday morning brain.