jdibble
True Blue
I have just started working for a hospital based physician practice that is using eClinical Works. I have been working on auditing the cardiologist practice at this point and have been seeing that for the patient's HPI for follow-up visits, they bring the old HPI forward, which makes no sense when you read the note - i.e. cc is 6 month f/u and HPI starts with - Patient here for chest pains for the past few weeks, etc. then the last sentence says no chest pain, or chest pain better. These leaves the note with really no HPI for the current visit. Then the ROS and Exam are templated - and each visit is exactly the same, whether it is their first visit, 2nd, 3rd, etc. Every now and then there is a short note of a change, but mostly every patient visit is documented the same.
Is this appropriate documentation for an EHR? I have never really audited for an EHR before and just wondering if anyone had any guidelines or information on what is considered appropriate use of a template and if this scenario is considered the normal use?
I am just not seeing how this can be considered correct documentation!![Frown :( :(]()
Thanks,![Confused :confused: :confused:]()
Is this appropriate documentation for an EHR? I have never really audited for an EHR before and just wondering if anyone had any guidelines or information on what is considered appropriate use of a template and if this scenario is considered the normal use?
I am just not seeing how this can be considered correct documentation!
Thanks,