If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Is it acceptable to use 'noncontributory, unremarkable or negative' when reporting past, family or social history?
Answer:
No, because the statement 'noncontributory, unremarkable or negative' does not indicate what was addressed. Did the nurse or physician ask specific conditions (i.e., any family history of coronary artery disease)? If for some reason you cannot obtain the family history, the documentation must support the reason why (e.g., the patient was adopted).
The provider does state that the family history was reviewed. So I would be tempted to count it, especially if I found any evidence of a questionaire completed by patient.
HOWEVER ... if the documentation read: Family History noncontributory ... I would NOT count it, because I'd have no way of knowing whether it was reviewed at all.
The BEST way to avoid this controversy is for the physician to get in the habit of being specific: Family history negative for any related diseases or syndromes.
Even with trauma I've trained my surgeons to ask and document family history of problems with anesthesia or bleeding issues. THAT is relevant to the proposed surgical intervention.