ljones88
Networker
Hi all,
I need help as I'm new to thoracic.
Dr performed 31622 prior to 32666. 32666 was planned so it wasn't like the dr did 31622 and then decided to perform 32666.
We billed 31622 and 32666. Aetna denied 31622 as inclusive. I understand NCCI states, "A diagnostic endoscopy is not separately reportable with a surgical endoscopy per CPT Manual instructions." I understand that to mean if any type of diagnostic endoscopy procedure is performed during the same session as a surgical endoscopy procedure, the diagnostic scope is not reported UNLESS two different scopes are used to assess separate issues.
I don't believe we should have billed 31622 in this case. Op note attached for reference. However, coworkers believe that because 2 separate scopes were used on different anatomic sites both scopes are reportable.
So I guess my question is this: Do we have grounds to bill both codes? What is the medical necessity of performing 31622 prior to 32666 other than to confirm the surgical field and confirm no other lesions were noted?
Thank you!
I need help as I'm new to thoracic.
Dr performed 31622 prior to 32666. 32666 was planned so it wasn't like the dr did 31622 and then decided to perform 32666.
We billed 31622 and 32666. Aetna denied 31622 as inclusive. I understand NCCI states, "A diagnostic endoscopy is not separately reportable with a surgical endoscopy per CPT Manual instructions." I understand that to mean if any type of diagnostic endoscopy procedure is performed during the same session as a surgical endoscopy procedure, the diagnostic scope is not reported UNLESS two different scopes are used to assess separate issues.
I don't believe we should have billed 31622 in this case. Op note attached for reference. However, coworkers believe that because 2 separate scopes were used on different anatomic sites both scopes are reportable.
So I guess my question is this: Do we have grounds to bill both codes? What is the medical necessity of performing 31622 prior to 32666 other than to confirm the surgical field and confirm no other lesions were noted?
Thank you!