martnel
Guest
How would you code the following OP Note? (11970/19370/19342) ??
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Status post right mastectomy and reconstruction; breast asymmetry with hypoplasia.
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Status post right mastectomy and reconstruction; breast asymmetry with hypoplasia.
OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: 1. Right implant exchange with capsulotomy.
2. Left subpectoral augmentation.
PRELIMINARY NOTE: This is a woman had undergone immediate post mastectomy reconstruction with placement of a tissue expander. She is now ready for implant exchange. On the left side, she had quite a small breast. Despite the fact that we had only planned to use a 300 cc implant for her right breast reconstruction, it would appear that she would need a small implant on the left.
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was prepped and draped after satisfactory induction of general endotracheal anesthesia. The old mastectomy scar was opened for a short distance. The capsule was identified and opened with cautery. The tissue expander was punctured and removed. A separate dissection was done to remove the port and tubing from the lateral chest wall.
A 180 degree capsulotomy was then done, keeping the inferior 180 degree arc intact because she had a well-defined inframammary crease. Particular attention had to be paid to release of the scar medially. The pocket was irrigated. A 300 cc sizer was placed and the wound closed loosely.
Our attention was turned to the contralateral side. The preoperative markings were used as a guide. We placed our inframammary crease incision at about 6 cm. We made an incision measuring about 5 cm. Dissection was taken down through the superficial fascia until the chest wall fascia was identified. This was used for access to the inferomedial costal and sternal origins of the pectoralis which was released to a point that corresponded to a point at about eight o'clock. Dissection was then taken laterally, leaving the serratus on the chest wall and creating a large subpectoral pocket. Hemostasis was acquired with bipolar cautery. We placed a 150 cc sizer into that pocket and closed the wound loosely. The patient was sat up and this appeared to be a good result for her permanent implant.
A 300 cc, high-profile, round implant was selected for the right and a 150 cc, moderate plus profile was selected for the left. These were inserted into the respective cavities. Closure was done with Vicryl and nylon. Sterile dressings were applied. The patient tolerated the procedure well.
PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Status post right mastectomy and reconstruction; breast asymmetry with hypoplasia.
POSTOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS: Status post right mastectomy and reconstruction; breast asymmetry with hypoplasia.
OPERATIVE PROCEDURE: 1. Right implant exchange with capsulotomy.
2. Left subpectoral augmentation.
PRELIMINARY NOTE: This is a woman had undergone immediate post mastectomy reconstruction with placement of a tissue expander. She is now ready for implant exchange. On the left side, she had quite a small breast. Despite the fact that we had only planned to use a 300 cc implant for her right breast reconstruction, it would appear that she would need a small implant on the left.
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: The patient was prepped and draped after satisfactory induction of general endotracheal anesthesia. The old mastectomy scar was opened for a short distance. The capsule was identified and opened with cautery. The tissue expander was punctured and removed. A separate dissection was done to remove the port and tubing from the lateral chest wall.
A 180 degree capsulotomy was then done, keeping the inferior 180 degree arc intact because she had a well-defined inframammary crease. Particular attention had to be paid to release of the scar medially. The pocket was irrigated. A 300 cc sizer was placed and the wound closed loosely.
Our attention was turned to the contralateral side. The preoperative markings were used as a guide. We placed our inframammary crease incision at about 6 cm. We made an incision measuring about 5 cm. Dissection was taken down through the superficial fascia until the chest wall fascia was identified. This was used for access to the inferomedial costal and sternal origins of the pectoralis which was released to a point that corresponded to a point at about eight o'clock. Dissection was then taken laterally, leaving the serratus on the chest wall and creating a large subpectoral pocket. Hemostasis was acquired with bipolar cautery. We placed a 150 cc sizer into that pocket and closed the wound loosely. The patient was sat up and this appeared to be a good result for her permanent implant.
A 300 cc, high-profile, round implant was selected for the right and a 150 cc, moderate plus profile was selected for the left. These were inserted into the respective cavities. Closure was done with Vicryl and nylon. Sterile dressings were applied. The patient tolerated the procedure well.