Jim Pawloski
True Blue
Hello everyone,
I have a case that is giving me trouble. A patient had a angioplasty of the proximal SFA, with suboptimal results. The physician then performed a atherectomy on that lesion. After that, the physician did an atherectomy on a distal SFA lesion, with suboptimal results. An angioplasty was then performed on the distal lesion.
Dr. Z states that if an angioplasty was performed, with suboptimal results, and an atherectomy is performed, you bill for the atherectomy. But what do when it is done in reverse?
Thanks,
Jim Pawloski, CIRCC, R.T.(CV)![Confused :confused: :confused:]()
I have a case that is giving me trouble. A patient had a angioplasty of the proximal SFA, with suboptimal results. The physician then performed a atherectomy on that lesion. After that, the physician did an atherectomy on a distal SFA lesion, with suboptimal results. An angioplasty was then performed on the distal lesion.
Dr. Z states that if an angioplasty was performed, with suboptimal results, and an atherectomy is performed, you bill for the atherectomy. But what do when it is done in reverse?
Thanks,
Jim Pawloski, CIRCC, R.T.(CV)