Nichole9288
Guest
We have a patient who was seen for a fat necrosis of her breast, status post breast reduction. The surgeon and patient decided upon an incisional breast biopsy to evaluate & diagnose the breast lump. (Past the 90 day global period).
The diagnosis on the pathology report came back as 611.3 (fat necrosis breast).
The insurer is kicking back our claim stating we can't bill 611.3 as the primary dx because the ICD9 book states "code first 996.79 breast necrosis due to breast graft).
Well, the patient didn't have an implant or graft.
What should we do in this case?
Thanks, Nichole![Confused :confused: :confused:]()
The diagnosis on the pathology report came back as 611.3 (fat necrosis breast).
The insurer is kicking back our claim stating we can't bill 611.3 as the primary dx because the ICD9 book states "code first 996.79 breast necrosis due to breast graft).
Well, the patient didn't have an implant or graft.
What should we do in this case?
Thanks, Nichole