rbagley123
New
Hi All,
Is it appropriate to attach a 51 modifier onto CPT code 93018 when in conjunction with code 93350?
Is it appropriate to attach a 51 modifier onto CPT code 93018 when in conjunction with code 93350?
-
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ & read the forum rules. To view all forums, post or create a new thread, you must be an AAPC Member. If you are a member and have already registered for member area and forum access, you can log in by clicking here. If you've forgotten your username or password use our password reminder tool. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below..
Wiki 51 modifier and cardiology
- Thread starter rbagley123
- Start date
johnmeyer
Guru
I would think so because those are two different procedures for the same body part/system, even though I'm sure an insurance company would argue that they are basically the same thing since the real difference is that one is an echocardiogram and the other is an electrocardiogram.
Have you tried submitting the claim with mod -51?
Oh.... and wouldn't it be nice to be able to bold the differences like I did to show an insurance company that would argue that the two tests are basically the same?
Have you tried submitting the claim with mod -51?
Oh.... and wouldn't it be nice to be able to bold the differences like I did to show an insurance company that would argue that the two tests are basically the same?
I have never used a -51 on the 93018 when submitting with 93350. I use the -26 on the 93350 and no modifier on the 93018. I am assuming that you are doing the stress echocardiogram in the hospital or outpatient testing center setting. This is how I bill:
93350 -26
93320 -26
93325 -26
93016
93018
Hope that helps you.
93350 -26
93320 -26
93325 -26
93016
93018
Hope that helps you.