ljones88
Networker
I am trying to adequately understand the reasoning behind the bundling of 30801 and 31240. My scenario is this: Surgeon performed 31240 on the left and 30801 bilaterally. 30801 was completed in order to reduce hypertrophic inferior turbinates (not for cauterization of other procedures done on the same day). 31240 was completed on the left to remove the concha bullosa causing nasal obstruction.
We billed 31240/LT and 30801/59. 31240/LT was paid and 30801/59 denied as bundled. My argument is this: 30801 only mentions work done on the inferior turbinates (Ablation, soft tissue of inferior turbinates, unilateral or bilateral, any method). 31240 doesn't mention anything done on the inferior turbinates so I would argue that since the description of service in 31240 (Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with concha bullosa resection) and Work RVU does not include work on the inferior turbinates, both should be payable. Or at the very least, the right sided ablation should be payable. The concha bullosa occured on the left middle turbinate only which should further boost my appeal reasoning as a seperate and distinct service from the ablation done bilaterally.
Am I losing it or do I have a fighting chance? Does anyone know the true reason behind CPT bundling these two codes??
We billed 31240/LT and 30801/59. 31240/LT was paid and 30801/59 denied as bundled. My argument is this: 30801 only mentions work done on the inferior turbinates (Ablation, soft tissue of inferior turbinates, unilateral or bilateral, any method). 31240 doesn't mention anything done on the inferior turbinates so I would argue that since the description of service in 31240 (Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with concha bullosa resection) and Work RVU does not include work on the inferior turbinates, both should be payable. Or at the very least, the right sided ablation should be payable. The concha bullosa occured on the left middle turbinate only which should further boost my appeal reasoning as a seperate and distinct service from the ablation done bilaterally.
Am I losing it or do I have a fighting chance? Does anyone know the true reason behind CPT bundling these two codes??