Jamie Dezenzo
True Blue
Hi all,
I had a patient 28010x10 (all toes addressed)…Did originally bill 28010 w/ T modifiers and rec'd denial. Checked w/ office and then billed 28010 10 units and no modifier.
Still rec'd denial “Payment adjusted because the payer deems the information submitted does not support this many/frequency services.”
Op note reads:
Attention was directed to the plantar surface of the toes. The toes all had a flexion contracture and the patient had a very flexible foot structure. A percutaneous 1-cm incision was made at the plantar surface of all 10 toes and a flexor tenotomy was performed by incising the FDL and FHL tendons at each of the incisions. This decreased the flexor contracture of the toes. The incisions were then irrigated and surtured w/ a single 4-0 Prolene suture in a horizontal mattress suture technique under each toe.
Medicare indicated to review LMRP but can't find any info….any insight?
ASC in Indiana….Thanks!
I had a patient 28010x10 (all toes addressed)…Did originally bill 28010 w/ T modifiers and rec'd denial. Checked w/ office and then billed 28010 10 units and no modifier.
Still rec'd denial “Payment adjusted because the payer deems the information submitted does not support this many/frequency services.”
Op note reads:
Attention was directed to the plantar surface of the toes. The toes all had a flexion contracture and the patient had a very flexible foot structure. A percutaneous 1-cm incision was made at the plantar surface of all 10 toes and a flexor tenotomy was performed by incising the FDL and FHL tendons at each of the incisions. This decreased the flexor contracture of the toes. The incisions were then irrigated and surtured w/ a single 4-0 Prolene suture in a horizontal mattress suture technique under each toe.
Medicare indicated to review LMRP but can't find any info….any insight?
ASC in Indiana….Thanks!