Urology Coding Alert
New CMS Tool Verifies Whether You are HIPAA Compliant
Patients and practices can now each check for this information. Increased scrutiny regarding patient information and computer security – and the potential repercussions for failure – can be nerve-wracking for any practice, no matter how much work you put into compliance. Good news: If you've ever wondered whether your transactions meet the required standards for privacy and security under HIPAA, your wait for solid information has ended. Now, you can find out with an updated educational tool from CMS. The Administrative Simplification Enforcement and Testing Tool (ASETT) offers both patients and providers the opportunity to voice a complaint or test medical transactions for compliance with HIPAA. "It [ASETT] specifically enables individuals or organizations to file a HIPAA and/or Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) complaint against a HIPAA-covered entity for potential noncompliance with the non- Privacy/Security provisions of HIPAA," said CMS guidance on the tool. The handy simplification gadget also lets practices test transactions for their compliancy. "Users can run several tests to verify transactions, or they can run a test to provide evidence for any violations associated with a complaint," the ASETT Quick Start User Guide explained. Access ASETT at: asett.cms.gov/ASETT_HomePage.
Related Articles
Urology Coding Alert
- Radiology Focus:
Follow This Advice the Next Time You Code Bladder Scans
Hint: Don't forget E/M could be allowed with 51798. Trends during the past several years [...] - CPT® 2018:
Look How Small Shifts to Observation Codes Could Mean Big Changes for Your Practice
Updates aim to clarify longtime confusion. As you prepared for code changes in 2018, you [...] - Reimbursement:
Don't Miss These MPFS Updates for 2018
E/M and quality measures still rank high in importance. As you get more settled into [...] - HIPAA Update:
New CMS Tool Verifies Whether You are HIPAA Compliant
Patients and practices can now each check for this information. Increased scrutiny regarding patient information [...] - You Be the Coder:
Differentiate Between Services of 53460 and 52214
Question: A patient's pre-procedure diagnosis was meatal irregular-appearing lesions involving the meatus at the junction [...] - Reader Question:
Look Beyond 3-year Rule for New vs. Established Patients
Question: What's the difference between a new and established patient in regard to evaluation and management [...] - Reader Question:
Submit 10021 or 10022 for Epididymal Cyst Aspiration
Question: The urologist used ultrasound guidance to evaluate the epididymis and multiple cysts within it [...] - Reader Question:
Skip the Bilateral Modifiers With 52005
Question: I'm seeing multiple posts on coding sites about coding a bilateral retrograde with the [...] - Reader Question:
Turn to 11004-11006 for Necrotizing Tissue Debridement
Question: I'm coding for the following report: An elliptical incision was made in the right [...] - Reader Question:
Verify Details Before Coding Transurethral Unroofing of Prostatic Abscess
Question: The patient was diagnosed with a prostate abscess. What CPT® code(s) should be reported [...]
