Neurology & Pain Management Coding Alert

Key: The number of providers in your group determines your choice.

If your practice participates in the Physician Quality Reporting (PQRS) and you have more than two providers, you’re faced with a new decision in 2013: Report as individuals or as a group.

Before you make a decision that could affect your practice’s bottom line, take a look at this rundown of the options and learn the 2013 changes that could change how you’re participating in PQRS.

Decide on Individual vs. Group Reporting

Eligible providers (EPs) have the option of reporting as either an individual or a group to earn their PQRS incentive.

As an individual, your PQRS quality measures are reported using your national provider number (NPI). However, the incentive payment is provided to the TIN reporting entity. An individual may report using traditional claims using the appropriate quality data codes on the claim form as part of the billing process. You may also report through a qualified registry in 2013 if you have access to one.

Third option: Of note, there is a third option of reporting via an electronic health record, but this option is not available to some providers at this time.

As a group, for the 2013 PQRS, CMS again redefined the Group Practice Reporting Option and changed the definition of a group practice to start at two or more eligible professionals practicing under the same TIN. “In 2010 the GPRO was only for groups with over 200 Eligible Professionals (Providers),” explains Jill M. Young, CPC, CEDC, CIMC, principle of Young Medical Consulting LLC in East Lansing, Mich. “In 2013 they have made a sort of small, medium and large distinction in the GPRO. Just remember, the reporting requirements are different for each of the three GPROs.”

Group practices with 99 or fewer eligible professionals must decide if they want to continue to report as individuals using one of the multiple reporting options for individuals described above, or if they would like to participate as a group. Group participation is referred to as the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO), says Dennis Beck, MD, FACEP, president and CEO Beacon Medical Services in Denver, Colo.

Beginning with the 2013 reporting year, group practices of 100 or more eligible professionals may be subject to a separate 1.0% Value-Based Payment Modifier in 2015. Such groups must self-nominate / register by October 15, 2013 to report quality data as a GPRO and then groups would typically elect to be reviewed using the administrative claims options. Unlike the individual reporting options, those who want to participate as a group must elect to do so by submitting a self-nomination statement via the web from July - Oct. 15, 2013. In the meantime, your group practice can set up your Individuals Authorized to Access CMS Computer Services (IACS) account. Only this authorized user can elect your GPRO when the web registration system opens, warns Beck.

Review the Group Reporting Options

If you’re reporting your quality data using the group designation, you should get familiar with three reporting options you might use. “There are different options, and you have to look at what is most appropriate for you,” Young explains.

GPRO Web Interface: The GPRO Web Interface is only available to group practices of 25 or more eligible professionals. Groups electing this option will report on a set of 18 primary care and prevention measures.

Note that this option is not recommended for hospital-based TINs and will not meet the criteria for the incentive for hospital-based group practices, Beck says.

GPRO Qualified Registry: CMS will offer group practices consisting of two or more eligible professionals the option to report PQRS measures through qualified registries. This is a new reporting option for group practices and actually the only option that smaller group practices (2-24 professionals) can use to qualify as a group for the 2013 PQRS incentive.

GPRO Administrative Claims Option: The new administrative claims option provides groups with an additional opportunity to avoid the 2015 PQRS and VBM penalties.  Under this option, CMS will analyze a group’s Medicare claims for a set of 17 measures for assigned beneficiaries, and specific quality data codes do not have to be submitted to CMS. CMS has agreed that for groups who elect this option, even if they have a denominator of zero for all measures, they can still avoid the 2015 PQRS penalty for this option only.

Although participation in the new administrative claims option does not earn a PQRS incentive, if a group practice elects to use the administrative claims option, the individual eligible professionals may still use the traditional claims or registry reporting mechanisms to qualify for the 2013 PQRS incentive for this option only, Beck explains.

Bottom line: You need to figure out where your practice falls in the guidelines, based on the number of providers you have reporting together as a group and then get to know the details and requirements associated with reporting at that level, Young says.