Do This When Coding for Sacroiliac Joint Tests
Question: An established 62-year-old patient presents with a seven-month history of chronic, dull, aching low back pain localized specifically over the right posterior sacroiliac (SI) joint, with pain radiating into the right buttock and posterior thigh. The patient reports pain during a Fortin finger test, pointing directly to the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS). Physical examination reveals positive results on a cluster of sacroiliac provocative tests, including the right-sided Patrick’s sign (FABER), Gaenslen’s sign, and the compression test. The patient has failed six months of conservative management, including chiropractic care, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and physical therapy. To determine if the SI joint is the source of pain (diagnostic) or to provide pain relief (therapeutic), the physician performs a right-sided periarticular nerve block. Using fluoroscopic guidance, a needle is placed to target the nerves innervating the right SI joint (lateral branch nerves). The provider injects a mixture of 2 mL of 1% lidocaine and 40 mg of methylprednisolone sodium succinate. The procedure notes document the specific nerves targeted, the medication used, and the immediate reduction in pain post-injection, confirming the diagnosis. The provider counsels the patient on the aftereffects of the procedure and requests they contact the clinic if anything outside of the typical results occurs. The patient is to return in six weeks for reevaluation. How should I report this encounter? Are the SI joint provocative tests separately reportable? Revenue Cycle Insider Subscriber Answer: You cannot report the SI joint tests separately; you should roll the work for those tests into the service level when deciding on an evaluation and management (E/M) code. On your claim, you should: Jessica Sullivan, CPC, COBGC, COSC, 
Consultant, Pinnacle Enterprise Consulting Services (PERCS)
