Can anyone help? I'm thinking 52332, 52352-51, and 74480-26
NAME OF PROCEDURE: Cystoscopy with left stone manipulation with stent placement
under fluoroscopic guidance.
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: After he was prepped and draped in the supine manner,
he was placed in the lithotomy position. Cystoscopy was unremarkable, the
bladder orifices were normal. A guidewire was placed up the left side in the
kidney under fluoroscopic guidance, and a faint shadow of the stone could be
identified. A dual-lumen catheter retrograde confirmed hydronephrosis and the
filling defect at the ureteropelvic junction. This was quite large stone. We
were able to manipulate the wire past the stone, and then a stent was placed.
At the end of the procedure, there was good curl in the kidney and bladder. It
was drained. There was no extravasation. He tolerated the procedure well and
was taken to the recovery room in stable condition.
NAME OF PROCEDURE: Cystoscopy with left stone manipulation with stent placement
under fluoroscopic guidance.
DESCRIPTION OF PROCEDURE: After he was prepped and draped in the supine manner,
he was placed in the lithotomy position. Cystoscopy was unremarkable, the
bladder orifices were normal. A guidewire was placed up the left side in the
kidney under fluoroscopic guidance, and a faint shadow of the stone could be
identified. A dual-lumen catheter retrograde confirmed hydronephrosis and the
filling defect at the ureteropelvic junction. This was quite large stone. We
were able to manipulate the wire past the stone, and then a stent was placed.
At the end of the procedure, there was good curl in the kidney and bladder. It
was drained. There was no extravasation. He tolerated the procedure well and
was taken to the recovery room in stable condition.