Reports

• Rockford Human Services Did Not Always Charge Allowable Costs to the Community Services Block Grant - Recovery Act Program

  

• Not All Community Services Block Grant Costs Claimed on Behalf of the Carbon County Community Action Committee for the Period October 1, 2008, Through September 30, 2010, Were Allowable

  

• New York State Claimed Unallowable Community Services Block Grant Recovery Act Costs for Action for a Better Community, Inc.

  

• Office of Human Concern, Inc., Claimed Allowable Costs Under a Recovery Act Grant

  

• Citizens for Citizens, Inc., Generally Charged Allowable Costs to the Community Services Block Grant Program and the Community Services Block Grant - Recovery Act Program

  

• Iowa Lacked Some Documentation for Its Childcare Assistance Program Claims

  

• The Columbus Urban League Claimed Some Unallowable Costs to Head Start

  

• Northeast Florida Community Action Agency, Inc., Did Not Always Charge Allowable Costs to the Community Services Block Grant - Recovery Act Program

  

• Economic Opportunity Commission of Nassau County, Inc., Claimed Some Unallowable Head Start Costs

  

• Louisiana Improperly Claimed Some Child Care and Development Fund Targeted Funds

  

• Neighborhood Centers, Inc., Claimed Unallowable Head Start Costs

  

• Connecticut Title IV-E Training Costs Did Not Always Comply With Federal Requirements

  

• Ohio Exceeded the 5-Percent Limit for Claiming Child Care Development Fund Administrative Expenditures

  

• The Council on Rural Service Programs, Inc., Claimed Unallowable Head Start Costs

  

• Agriculture and Labor Program, Inc., Did Not Always Charge Allowable Costs to the Community Services Block Grant - Recovery Act Program

  

• Pennsylvania Generally Claimed Allowable Community Services Block Grant Recovery Act Costs for Community Action Program of Lancaster County