Urology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Urinary Retention

Test your coding knowledge. Determine how you would code this situation before looking at the box below for the answer.


Question: Can you bill for urinary retention after prostate seed implantation during the global period? I say put a modifier -79 on the catheterization or a -24 on the evaluation and management visit. Does an intraoperative consult automatically become a level four or five (i.e., to find a ureter for a general surgeon)?

-Florida Subscriber

  Answer: Per CPT guidelines, postoperative urinary retention would be reported separately because it could not be considered normal uncomplicated follow-up care. Modifiers -24 (unrelated E/M service by the same physician during a postoperative period) and -79 (unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period) would be correct.

There are some payers, however, who would consider the retention a complication of the procedure and not allow payment for services provided in the physicians office. Check with the payer for specific guidelines. Most payers should consider office services for post-op retention exempt from the global period of the surgery because the retention was not due to a problem with the surgical technique. Medicare and private payers have been known to deny the services even with correct modifier usage, so you may have to appeal.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Urology Coding Alert

View All