Question: The urologist removed a left ureteral stone with semi-rigid ureteroscopy. He also removed a second left stone, which was a renal stone, with a flexible pyeloscopy. He performed both removals with basket retrieval with a cystoscopy placement of a ureteral stent. Can I report both stones since two different scopes were used? This patient already had recently underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) with stent placement, and postoperatively she developed steinstrasse, which is a column of stone fragments that form and block the ureter. So, my urologist was removing the stone fragments from the previous ESWL. Can you help me? AAPC Forum Subscriber
Answer: When you review this scenario clinically, it appears that the stone in the ureter was caused from a fragment of the renal stone fragmented by ESWL that then passed into the ureter. The renal stone appears to be a remnant of the renal stone not completely fragmented by ESWL. Considering these facts, you should report the following codes for your second clinical scenario: Don’t miss: The second 52352 may not be paid, but it was a stone in a different noted organ with modifier XS and should be paid. Appeal if this second code is denied.