Urology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Redocking the Robot Doesn't Equal Separate Codes
Published on Wed Mar 19, 2014
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Urology Coding Alert
- Case Study:
4 Scenarios Help Hone Your Periurethral Cyst Procedure Coding
Determine the exact clinical circumstances and cyst location before starting your code search. While periurethral [...] - ICD-10 Quiz:
Test Your ICD-10 Know-How With These 10 Questions
Determine whether you are ready for the October 1 implementation. With ICD-10 implementation just around [...] - Bilateral Billing:
Overcome Modifier 50 vs. LT/RT Confusion By Researching Payer Policy
Varied policies aren’t just limited to private payers. There are many procedures that your urologist [...] - You Be the Coder:
In-Office Post-Op Wound Infection Treatment
Question: We had a patient who was status post bladder sling (still in 90-day global period). [...] - Clip and Save:
Quickly Determine If You Need a Bilateral Modifier With This Chart
Keep this list handy to check your urological surgery codes before attaching 50, LT, or [...] - Reader Question:
Interventional Varicocele Ablation Calls for a New Code
Question: How do I code for interventional radiology percutaneous ablation of a varicocele? Florida Subscriber Answer: There [...] - Reader Question:
Redocking the Robot Doesn't Equal Separate Codes
Question: I am having a disagreement with one of my doctors, regarding 50548. When performed robotically, [...] - Reader Question:
Capture Mitrofanoff Revision Using 52
Question: How would you code a cystogram, left allograft nephrectomy, ileal augmentation of bladder, and [...] - Reader Question:
Skip 99000 for In-Office UAs
Question: If we do a urinalysis (UA) dipstick test in the office lab and find [...]
View All
