Urology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Payer Determines Whether 52310 + 52315 Is Allowed
Published on Tue Feb 20, 2018
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Urology Coding Alert
- Procedure Focus:
Adrenalectomy 101: Begin with the Basics to Find Success
Use these real-world examples as your guide. A multitude of questions need answering before you [...] - Coding Check:
Test Your Real-world Knowledge of Adrenalectomy Coding
How well can you answer these common questions? We gave you three scenarios related to [...] - Surgical Coding:
Follow These 4 Steps for Quick – but Accurate – Vasectomy Coding
Tip: When You should separately code semen analysis Vasectomies can be one of the most [...] - You Be the Coder:
Remember the Overpayment Clock Ticks Is Ticking
Question: If we realize we've received overpayments from CMS, what are the rules for returning [...] - Reader Question:
List 52235 as the Primary Surgical Code for TURBT
Question: We billed codes 52224 and 52235 together (appending modifier 59 to 52235). The payer denied 52235, [...] - Reader Question:
Code 52315 Represents Complicated Urethral Calculi Removal
Question: Our urologist used grasping forceps to retrieve several stones that were embedded in the [...] - Reader Question:
Payer Determines Whether 52310 + 52315 Is Allowed
Question: During an operative session my urologist performed brachytherapy in conjunction with a radiation oncologist. [...] - Reader Question:
Urodynamics After TVT Can Have Different Coding
Question: If a physician performs urodynamics in the office within the 90 day global period [...] - Reader Question:
Do Not Consider 50394 for Involved Nephrostomy Case
Question: A patient presented with previously placed nephrostomy tube and a 3-cm renal pelvic stone [...]
View All
